As do I. Gaelan
> On Jan 12, 2020, at 4:06 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business > <agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > Jason Cobb wrote: >>> 8285 Alexis 3.0 Line-Item Roulette >> >> AGAINST. This proposal does not secure specifications of indeterminacy, >> so a power-0.1 could potentially tamper with higher-power rules by >> specifying data the higher-powered rule depends on as indeterminate, or >> even tamper with secured switches. > > Argh, well spotted. I originally considered voting against this despite its > seeming harmlessness, based solely on my priors for Alexis's proposals being > scams. Should've trusted my instincts. :P > > I change my vote on proposal 8285 to AGAINST. > > -twg
