I vote as follows: > ID Author(s) AI Title > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 8322* Falsifian, Alexis, twg 3.0 Unrepetition v1.1 Why not? ENDORSE Falsifian.
> 8323* Jason 3.0 Secure Ribbons Conditional: AGAINST if Jason votes AGAINST; otherwise PRESENT. Undeniably a good idea, but I can't quite bring myself to give up on such a juicy scam target. > 8324l Falsifian 2.0 Democratic unassignment ENDORSE Falsifian > 8325e Falsifian 2.0 Inflation Vote Conditional: AGAINST if Falsifian votes AGAINST; otherwise PRESENT. (Remaining officially neutral as Treasuror.) NB: Your definition of "Median" does not match the usual mathematical definition for cases where there are an even number of ballots. For example, for [1, 1000, 3000, 3000000], it picks 3000. > 8326* Falsifian 3.0 Attempted cleanup ENDORSE Falsifian > 8327l Falsifian 1.0 Blink test v1.2 ENDORSE Falsifian > 8328* Falsifian 3.0 The Eternal Sprit ENDRSE Falsfian > 8329p Alexis 1.0 RtRW Reschedule ENDORSE Alexis > 8330* G. 3.0 No looting white ribbons ENDORSE G. > 8331j Warrigal 1.7 Promissory cleanliness Conditional: AGAINST if Warrigal votes AGAINST; otherwise PRESENT. I don't object in principle, but, I mean, you didn't _have_ to set your pledge's expiry date a full year in the future... > 8332f Murphy, Alexis 1.0 Switch Responsibility Responsibility AGAINST. The existing behaviour should already take care of this. I wouldn't be totally opposed to a fallback like this to be used in the unlikely event of a bug, but in that case it should be Without Objection. > 8333l Murphy, Alexis 2.0 Meaningful extra votes AGAINST. Would like to playtest the current voting strength rules for a bit before trying to fiddle with them. > 8334e Murphy, Alexis 2.0 Meaningless extra coins AGAINST. Trivially bypassed with zombies or contracts. > 8335f Murphy 2.0 Consistent ADoP duties AGAINST; again, there is already text in the rules for this situation. I agree it could do with some cleanup, but this doesn't do that. > 8336* Jason 3.0 Define "publicly" ENDORSE Jason > 8337e Murphy 1.0 Fix Auctions AGAINST per Jason > 8338l Murphy 2.0 Clarify quorum (option 1) ENDORSE Murphy > 8339l Murphy 2.0 Clarify quorum (option 2) Conditional: AGAINST if Murphy votes AGAINST; otherwise PRESENT. > 8340p Alexis 1.0 The Paradox of Self-Appointment ENDORSE Alexis > 8341* Alexis, G. 3.0 Support of the Person Still AGAINST, based on the mathematics of Agoran consent. I agree with you that it would make more intuitive sense for it to work in the same way as adoption indices, but the existing uses in the ruleset are built around the assumption that it doesn't. If you want to change the behaviour then I really think it needs to come with a review of the current thresholds used for dependent actions with Agoran consent. Especially for low values of N, where the effect is more pronounced. -twg
