I submit the following Diplonomic proposal, "Proposal Timing":

Amend Rule 8 by replacing:
"When a Proposal has received a number of non-withdrawn votes in favor greater
than half the number of Contestants, the Judge SHALL, in a timely fashion,
and CAN enact the proposal by publishing the new text of the rules and the
number of votes in favor and against. The Judge SHALL NOT reveal the votes
of specific Contestants."
with
"If a Proposal has received a number of non-withdrawn votes in favor greater
than half the number of Contestants, the Judge CAN enact the proposal by
publishing the new text of the rules and the number of votes in favor and
against, and SHALL do so immediately after resolving orders the next time
e does so. As an exception, if a proposal was designated as urgent in the
message in which it was submitted, the Judge MAY enact the proposal sooner,
and SHOULD do so as soon as possible. Proposals SHOULD NOT be designated
as urgent unless they are bug-fixes, and the Judge SHOULD NOT resolve
non bug-fix proposals early. The Judge SHALL NOT reveal the votes of
specific Contestants."

Reply via email to