I intend, with notice, to file the following proof of a claim of a valid
judgment:
{
In the message at the following link, I filed a claim of a valid judgement.
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2020-September/044830.html
<https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2020-September/044830.html>
}
I intend, with support, to group-file a motion to reconsider CFJ 3882.
Arguments: what G. Filed wasn't a proof of a *claim* of a valid judgement; it
was just a valid judgment. He never proved that he made the claim, which is
plainly what is required by the phrasing.
(Sorry, I only realized this as I read the ruling on the CFJ.)
Gaelan
> On Sep 7, 2020, at 11:39 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business
> <agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> I claim that I validly judged CFJ 3878 (this can be seen at
> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3874
> <https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3874>).
>
> Gaelan
>
>> On Aug 24, 2020, at 9:56 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business
>> <agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>>
>> Contract: Proofs of Claim
>>
>> Any player CAN, with notice, file a proof of a claim of a valid
>> judgement. The first player to do so CAN once act on Aris's behalf to
>> transfer 10 coins from Aris to emself; immediately thereafter, this
>> contract is destroyed.
>
