On 2/18/23 11:49, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: > H. Rulekeepor, > > I make the following submissions for RtRW (a start, anyway). Note: > If I list a rule, it means I've also looked at all annotations > currently in that rule and think any unmentioned are up-to-date/worth > keeping. > > -G.
Note that there are some questions below. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rule 101/17 (Power=4) > The Game of Agora > > ADD > CFJ 2515 (called 08 May 2009): Failure to 'Please treat Agora Right > Good Forever' can be a rules violation in extreme circumstances. Accepted. +1. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rule 1698/7 (Power=4) > Agora Is A Nomic > > ADD > CFJ 3765 (called 31 Jul 2019): A reasonable combination of actions > for allowing arbitrary rule changes could include repealing this > rule first. > Accepted. +1. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rule 869/51 (Power=3) > How to Join and Leave Agora > > ADD > CFJ 3455 (called 03 Aug 2016): Ratifying an unregistered person as a > player fails without that person's willful consent. > Accepted. +1. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rule 478/41 (Power=3) > Fora > > ADD > CFJ 3948 (called 05 Mar 2022): Sending a message "to" a player via a > nonpublic forum requires, at minimum, explicit signaling of the > intended recipient in a forum-dependent manner. Accepted. +1. > > > AMEND > I think this one should be 3884 not 3887? > CFJ 3887 (called 06 Sep 2020): A forum is an open medium for > communication. Accepted. +1. > DELETE > (Out of date/not in keeping with current rules) > > CFJ 752 (called 13 Mar 1995): Something sent to a Player who is > obligated to send it to all Players is sufficient for sending > something to the PF. Accepted. +1. > CFJ 831 (called 10 Nov 1995): 'The Date: header of a message is not > necessarily the time at which the message takes effect.' Why is this now inaccurate? We've held that not all Date headers are to be trusted, right? > CFJ 1695 (called 23 Jun 2007): A partnership, which by its nature can't > directly send email, can participate in the fora by means of its > members sending messages on its behalf, if its governing agreement > says so. Accepted. +1. > CFJ 1833-1834 (called 18 Dec 2007): A player can, by contractual > arrangement, grant another player the capacity to act by > announcement on eir behalf. Accepted. +1. > CFJ 1893 (called 03 Feb 2008): A non-consensual non-contractual > arrangement cannot grant a player the capacity to act by > announcement on behalf of another. Accepted. +1. > CFJ 2397 (called 03 Mar 2009): A player can grant or revoke permission > at will for another player to act by announcement on eir behalf. Accepted. +1. > CFJ 2322 (called 24 Dec 2008): The ability to act on behalf can be > created by any willful agreement. Accepted. +1. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Mad Engineer, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
