>
> I vote as follows:

>
> > ID      Author(s)               AI    Title
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 9058*   Aris, G.                3.0   Things Mean What They're Meant to
> > Mean
> >

FOR. This is maybe more complex than it needs to be, but it's a starting
point. We certainly need *some* change along these lines.

> 9059~   Maloney                 1.0   Ambiguity Amendment

AGAINST

> 9060~   Maloney                 1.0   Ambiguity Amendment


AGAINST. I'm not convinced that this doesn't work, but I'm more convinced
that mine does. Also, please don't do the whole bold formatting thing
again; it's really confusing.

9061~   snail                   2.0   Wake Up Call


Conditional: If Janet's votes FOR or PRESENT, PRESENT. Otherwise, AGAINST.

-Aris

>

Reply via email to