Murphy wrote:
No, it limits its own jurisdiction, so there is no conflict, so
R1482 never comes into play. For its intent to be thwarted by
R1482, it would have to be worded like this:
The voting limit of an eligible voter on an ordinary proposal is
one. This rule defers to other rules which attempt to modify
this limit.
Sorry, don't buy it. If a rule sets a property value, then allows
other rules to modify that property, it is deferring to those other
rules for setting that value, even if it doesn't use the word
"defer". In the absence of a nomic defintion of "defer", we have to
rely on such common-language definitions.
-Goethe
