Murphy wrote:
I thought you were the big proponent of resolving things judicially?
I am!
I call for judgement on the following statement, barring Goethe, OscarMeyr, and Zefram:
But you didn't bar the Pineapple Partnership! Will the PP's eligibility to judge block Rotation, etc.? I think "our" way is a little safer... if a judge of a PP-called CFJ says that PP isn't a person, then the CFJ and eir opinion has no legal effect, but is probably a suitable-enough "guide" for interpretation that it would close the matter. -Goethe
