On 5/17/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you intend there to be no precedence mechanism at all? And what
about supermajority voting?
I don't intend that supermajority voting vanish.
As for precedence, there is almost certainly a nice system out there
that we haven't tried, since we've essentially only tried two (as far
as I am aware), Suber's and the current one. It might be interesting
to see what would happens were the rules to pretend they contain no
contradictions.
I don't have a proposal of my own here, which is why the magic cookie
and (virtual) pat on the back are being offered.
--
C. Maud Image (Michael Slone)
It's your fault, H. Notary!
-- Manu, in agora-discussion
