I don't suppose there's any way of just appending this to the arguments of the judgement I haven't appealed yet, is there... really wishing for concurring opinions here... anyway, apology unnecessary and certainly accepted. -Goethe
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Ed Murphy wrote: > I interpret the statement as implicitly looking forward to what its > judge will be allowed to do, thus allowing self-reference and making > both TRUE and FALSE inappropriate (according to the caller's arguments). > > I stand by my previous interpretation that IRRELEVANT is appropriate, > and that the caller's arguments were incorrect in claiming that it was > not. However, the appropriateness of UNDECIDABLE does not depend on > this, only on the inappropriateness of TRUE and FALSE. > > While I have the floor, I take the opportunity to apologize to Panelist > Goethe for improperly skimming past eir original appellate arguments, > as well as to Caller root for failing to give sufficient credit to eir > original arguments. I then (pseudo-)judge UNDECIDABLE.
