On 11/17/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Repeatedly appealing a judgement because of an unsatisfactory result is
> only legal through a loophole and should not be. I suggest that the
> appeal panel wait two weeks, then judge AFFIRM, thereby removing the
> possibility of appeal from the case.
No, repeatly appealing the *same* judgement is a loophole. Appealing
the *new* judgement is perfectly reasonable.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
