On Nov 28, 2007 2:56 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 28, 2007 2:49 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A compromise offer: nkep is clearly not understandable to most Agorans, > > and thus the burden falls onto the users of the term to show it is > > an action. If they can provide evidence in four days that nkep is an > > action (e.g. a copy of a contract, with reasonably acceptable evidence > > dated to before the CFJ in question), we can find otherwise, else we'll > > find FALSE. We can't Order this (no Orders anymore) but we can post the > > request... > > I can accept that. > I believe I can furnish such proof, although it may take me several days to have it ready. Would you be willing to extend the window?
BobTHJ
