On Nov 28, 2007 2:49 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm afraid I disagree. I know nothing of the kind. We don't have enough > information to determine what it means. (By the way, the "to" is not part > of the nonsense phrase, that's important in construing a possible verb).
You're assuming that "to nkep..." is intended as a verb phrase. Perhaps "nkep..." is an entity, and the statement is that the unknown antecedent of "it" is in some way permissible to that entity. The way I see it, if part of a clause is nonsense, then the whole clause is nonsense. -root
