Maybe I'm missing something about this proposal, but the only thing this appears to do is to make an arbitrary gamestate variable based on a private contract. I don't understand why I should vote to pass this.
On Dec 9, 2007 9:17 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I create the following proposal: > "Elephants" > Create the following rule: > There are 5 elephants. > There is an elephant switch, known as Elephant Location; its valid > values are > North, South, East, West, and Over There (default). It is tracked > by the > Department of Mental Health. > > Upon adoption of this proposal: four elephants have their Elephant > Location > set to the cardinal directions. > > I create the following proposal: > "Hats" > Create the following rule: > There is a person switch, known as Hat-Wearing; its valid values > are Wearing > and Not Wearing (default). It is tracked by the Department of > Mental Health. > A person may toggle their Hat-Wearing by announcement; this is > "putting on" > or "taking off" a hat. > > Upon adoption of this proposal, Murphy puts on a hat. > -- -----Iammars www.jmcteague.com
