On 12/12/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I explicitly enumerated the allowable printing methods, and base 256 > wasn't one of them. Or at least that was my intention. I'll have to > be clearer next time. What about little-endian binary?
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Brainfuck Golf, Hole #1 Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Brainfuck Golf, Hole #1 Geoffrey Spear
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Brainfuck Golf, Hole #1 Ed Murphy
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Brainfuck Golf, Hole #1 Geoffrey Spear
- DIS: Re: BUS: Brainfuck Golf, Hole #1 comex
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Brainfuck Golf, Hole #1 Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Brainfuck Golf, Hole #1 Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Brainfuck Golf, Hole #1 Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Brainfuck Golf, Hole #1 comex
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Brainfuck Golf, Hol... Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Brainfuck Golf,... comex
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Brainfuck Golf,... Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Brainfuck Golf,... Zefram
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Brainfuck Golf,... Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Brainfuck Golf, Hole #1 Zefram
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Brainfuck Golf, Hole #1 Kerim Aydin
- DIS: Re: BUS: Brainfuck Golf, Hole #1 Ian Kelly