On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On a side note, I would remind players who are critical of the > Protection Racket agreement that by harshly dealing with the RBOA in > this case as a result of the overlapping membership you would be > corrupting the very judicial system you claim to wish to keep > incorruptible.
How is enforcing a clearly-written rule forbidding the act of registering a corruption of the judicial system?
