On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 8:36 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Gratuitous argument: > > > > While the basis of the RBOA and Protection Racket may have been the > > same at the time of RBOA's registration such is no longer the case. > > Less than 12 hours after the registration of the RBOA comex joined the > > Protection Racket causing their bases to become distinct. > > Counter-argument: I did not join "Protection Racket". In fact, I > attempted to join a contract titled "Proposal Racket". Bonus points > if you know why.
Oops...my mistake. My argument still stands however as ehird joined the Protection Racket approx 13 hours after the registration of the RBOA. BobTHJ
