On Jun 24, 2008, at 6:24 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
========================= Criminal Case 2011
=========================
comex breached Rule 1742 by continued failure to comply with the
terms of the binding Vote Market contract.
====================================================================
====
BobTHJ, some details on this please?
Per the Vote Market agreement:
10. When the VP of a first-class party falls below 50, e is
OBLIGATED to
increase it to 50 or above within 60 days.
Jan 15, 2008 23:09 - comex -50VP (Buy ticket filled by pikhq)
- comex spent all 50 of his VP in taking this action leaving him with
0 remaining during the next 60 days comex took no actions to increase
eir VP.
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:09 - comex's fails to return VP >= 50
- since this date comex has been in breach of section 10 of the Vote
Market agreement. During that time he has made only two attempts to
increase eir VP.
Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:14 - Bank of Agora transfers 21VP to comex
- this was when comex recently robbed the Bank of Agora and its VP
were transferred to em.
Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:05 - comex +10VP (Sell Ticket filled by Goethe)
- this is the one and only Sell Ticket comex has posted since Jan 15th
when he first fell below the 50VP threshold.
BobTHJ
Thanks, Bob. That looks pretty straightforward, so GUILTY looks like
the ruling in this one too.
Is it worth stringing up comex over these?
-----
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr the Vicious
