On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A fair question, and one that has been vexing me as late. The question: > what does "continue to play" mean? That phrasing of R101 didn't envision > attempting to having contracts that were permitted to be binding to > non-players.
I for one would be happy to eliminate the possibility of non-players "playing in the larger sense".
