On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks to the evidence BobTHJ provided, these are straightforward: comex > did not comply with the relevant provision of the Vote Market contract, > resulting in a ruling in CFJ 2011 of GUILTY, nor did e comply with the terms > set down in CFJ 1915, resulting in a ruling in CFJ 2012 of GUILTY. > > There has been a LOT of criminal CFJs these past two months. I believe a > strong message needs to be sent to the Agoran community. I sentence comex > to hang by the -- > > Oh wait, that's not a valid sentence. > > I sentence comex to CHOKEY for 90 days (as R1742 is a Power 1.5 rule).
I don't think this sentence was validly assigned, as it does not specify to which question on sentencing it is to be assigned, the one in CFJ 2011 or the one in CFJ 2012. -root
