root wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Thanks to the evidence BobTHJ provided, these are straightforward: comex >> did not comply with the relevant provision of the Vote Market contract, >> resulting in a ruling in CFJ 2011 of GUILTY, nor did e comply with the terms >> set down in CFJ 1915, resulting in a ruling in CFJ 2012 of GUILTY. >> >> There has been a LOT of criminal CFJs these past two months. I believe a >> strong message needs to be sent to the Agoran community. I sentence comex >> to hang by the -- >> >> Oh wait, that's not a valid sentence. >> >> I sentence comex to CHOKEY for 90 days (as R1742 is a Power 1.5 rule). > > I don't think this sentence was validly assigned, as it does not > specify to which question on sentencing it is to be assigned, the one > in CFJ 2011 or the one in CFJ 2012.
I interpreted it as a reasonably clear intent to assign concurrent sentences in both cases.
