On Jul 13, 2008, at 12:52 PM, Taral wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ais523 has pointed out an interesting hole in R2136, that a
contestmaster
does not have to remain a member of the contest. Accordingly,
root's as
contestmaster of Brainfuck Golf did not depend on eir being a
member of the
contest. Therefore, root did not violate provision 11 of the
contest, nor
R1742, and so I DRAFT rule INNOCENT.
That would be UNIMPUGNED, no?
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The action in question was failure to act in accordance with the
contract, and I draft rule that root did not commit such a failure.
INNOCENT seems correct here.
Would it help if we just merged the two options?
-----
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
