On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 8:01 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> {action="X violated Z by Y", rule=Z} -- INNOCENT
>
> This looks like UNIMPUGNED to me.

It's INNOCENT if the action, "X violated Z by Y", did not occur,
UNIMPUGNED if "X violated Z by Y" is not proscribed by Z.

--Ivan Hope CXXVII

Reply via email to