On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 8:01 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> {action="X violated Z by Y", rule=Z} -- INNOCENT > > This looks like UNIMPUGNED to me.
It's INNOCENT if the action, "X violated Z by Y", did not occur, UNIMPUGNED if "X violated Z by Y" is not proscribed by Z. --Ivan Hope CXXVII