tusho wrote: > 2008/7/15 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I still need 3 more votes on whether to lynch Pavitra. >> I recommend amending the contract to require votes to be cast as soon >> as possible, with severe penalties for not doing so. A 2-week voting >> period is a bit ridiculous. >> > > And PUBLIC VOTING, this game sucks. It misses the point entirely.
Like I said before, I've played it several times F2F where voting is instantaneous and simultaneous (thus effectively private), and it works fine there, though the delay in translating to e-mail is rather annoying. Note that, in both situations, you can /say/ you're going to vote a certain way (but it may turn out that you were lying, or that you legitimately changed your mind) so it's just another level of potential deception.
