On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Instead of penalties, I suggest deciding the omitted votes at random >> after the voting period ends. That'll at least make people's laziness >> interesting. > > I'm not fond of this idea. Due to the imbalance of information, votes > already tend to skew toward lynching a townsperson and away from > lynching a werewolf, which means that every townsperson's vote > matters. Villagers who have abandoned the game should be discounted, > not decided randomly.
Er, I think that I confused townspeople with villagers throughout this post. More distinctive naming would be nice. -root
