Re: DIS: Re: BUS: The Demon Proposals

[ais523]

On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 15:07 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, ais523 wrote:
> > CFJs don't stop ratification unless they clearly state that they are for
> > the purpose of stopping ratification. (I was intending to use this to
> > force through my Disclaimer Scam, but I think it would have failed on
> > other grounds.)
> 
> Well the Registrar's report doesn't self-ratify, and we've questioned
> the Proposal adoption which directly questions the proposal contents.
> So I think it's challenged.  -Goethe
The Registrar's report should self-ratify IMO, as it's probably the
report in which a mistake can cause the largest chaos to the gamestate.
-- 
ais523