On Sep 7, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:

On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2134

============================== CFJ 2134 ==============================

   Gender Neutral pronouns(e.g eir, e, and e's) are words granted
   meaning and usage under the set of rules excluding 754(4).

===================================================================== ===

I judge UNDETERMINED.  754(4) is not the id number of a rule, so "the
set of rules excluding 754(4)" is not meaningful.

As side commentary, R754/4 wouldn't apply either. R754 is currently at amendment 7, and amendment 4 was a while ago:

History:
Created by Proposal 435 (Alexx), Aug. 30 1993
Amended by Proposal 754 (KoJen), Dec. 1 1993
Amended by Rule 750, Dec. 1 1993
Amended(1) by Proposal 2042, Dec. 11 1995
Infected and Amended(2) by Rule 1454, Dec. 17 1995
Amended(3) by Proposal 3452 (Steve), Apr. 7 1997, substantial
Amended(4) by Proposal 3915 (harvel), Sep. 27 1999
Power changed from 1 to 3 by Proposal 4507 (Murphy), 20 June 2003
Amended(5) by Proposal 4507 (Murphy), 20 June 2003
Amended(6) by Proposal 4866 (Goethe), 27 August 2006
Amended(7) by Proposal 5038 (Zefram), 28 June 2007

-----
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr

Reply via email to