On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 1:06 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 08:04 -0400, comex wrote:
>> I initiate a criminal case against pikhq, for breaching Rule 104 by
>> not being Michael Norrish.
> With 2 support, I intend to initiate a criminal case against pikhq for
> breaching rule 104 by not being Michael Norrish. (I was thinking along
> similar lines myself independently, may as well test it!)

Trivially unimpugned.  BobTHJ is Speaker.

Reply via email to