On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 13:16 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 1:06 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 08:04 -0400, comex wrote:
>>>> I initiate a criminal case against pikhq, for breaching Rule 104 by
>>>> not being Michael Norrish.
>>> With 2 support, I intend to initiate a criminal case against pikhq for
>>> breaching rule 104 by not being Michael Norrish. (I was thinking along
>>> similar lines myself independently, may as well test it!)
>>
>> Trivially unimpugned.  BobTHJ is Speaker.
> Are you sure? tusho was never awarded MWoP, despite winning. (E was
> deregistered before anyone had a chance to award the title; I will not
> here go into the argument about whether e ought to have been awarded it
> or not.)

BobTHJ became speaker when pikhq went inactive.  As for tusho, maybe
there's a case to be made that the requirement to make the award didn't
expire, so I still should?  -Goethe




Reply via email to