On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, ais523 wrote: > On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 13:16 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 1:06 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 08:04 -0400, comex wrote: >>>> I initiate a criminal case against pikhq, for breaching Rule 104 by >>>> not being Michael Norrish. >>> With 2 support, I intend to initiate a criminal case against pikhq for >>> breaching rule 104 by not being Michael Norrish. (I was thinking along >>> similar lines myself independently, may as well test it!) >> >> Trivially unimpugned. BobTHJ is Speaker. > Are you sure? tusho was never awarded MWoP, despite winning. (E was > deregistered before anyone had a chance to award the title; I will not > here go into the argument about whether e ought to have been awarded it > or not.)
BobTHJ became speaker when pikhq went inactive. As for tusho, maybe there's a case to be made that the requirement to make the award didn't expire, so I still should? -Goethe