On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ais523 wrote: > >> Murphy: >>> In any case, I deny this CoE (to clear up my obligation to respond >>> to it), and will let the relevant CFJ take care of it from here. >> I publically state that Murphy's attempt to resolve proposal 5707 is subject >> to a CFJ (whose number has not yet been assigned) and therefore cannot >> self-ratify. > > I publically state the same of the Monster's attempts to resolve this > decision. (FWIW, the ID numbers will be 2202 through 2205.)
All right, four CFJs. That's pretty decent for a potential win. -root
