Pavitra wrote: > On Wednesday 01 October 2008 02:26:17 pm Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> I submit the following Proposal entitled "No More Monster Deputy": >> >> In Rule 2193, remove: >> Any Monster (a deputy) CAN perform an action as if e held a >> particular office (deputise for that office) if: >> >> (a) the rules require the holder of that office, by virtue of >> holding that office, to perform the action (or, if the >> office is vacant, would so require if the office were >> filled > > That's boring. > > I submit the following Proposal entitled "More Reasonable Monster > Deputy", AI=1, II=1: > > { > Wooble is a coauthor of this proposal. > > Amend rule 2193 as follows: if the text > Any Monster (a deputy) CAN perform an action as if e held a > particular office (deputise for that office) if: > > (a) the rules require the holder of that office, by virtue of > holding that office, to perform the action (or, if the > office is vacant, would so require if the office were > filled > > exists in rule 2193, then replace it with the following; otherwise, > insert the following after the paragraph containing the > word "Monsteredict": > > Any player (a deputy) CAN perform an action as if e held a > particular office (deputise for that office) if: > > (a) the rules require the holder of that office, by virtue of > holding that office, to perform the action (or, if the > office is vacant, would so require if the office were > filled); and > > (b) a time limit by which the rules require the action to be > performed has expired > } > > [Makes fast and sudden deputisation a perk rather than a superpower.]
Wait. What?