Pavitra wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 October 2008 02:26:17 pm Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I submit the following Proposal entitled "No More Monster Deputy":
>>
>> In Rule 2193, remove:
>> Any Monster (a deputy) CAN perform an action as if e held a
>> particular office (deputise for that office) if:
>>
>> (a) the rules require the holder of that office, by virtue of
>> holding that office, to perform the action (or, if the
>> office is vacant, would so require if the office were
>> filled
>
> That's boring.
>
> I submit the following Proposal entitled "More Reasonable Monster
> Deputy", AI=1, II=1:
>
> {
> Wooble is a coauthor of this proposal.
>
> Amend rule 2193 as follows: if the text
> Any Monster (a deputy) CAN perform an action as if e held a
> particular office (deputise for that office) if:
>
> (a) the rules require the holder of that office, by virtue of
> holding that office, to perform the action (or, if the
> office is vacant, would so require if the office were
> filled
>
> exists in rule 2193, then replace it with the following; otherwise,
> insert the following after the paragraph containing the
> word "Monsteredict":
>
> Any player (a deputy) CAN perform an action as if e held a
> particular office (deputise for that office) if:
>
> (a) the rules require the holder of that office, by virtue of
> holding that office, to perform the action (or, if the
> office is vacant, would so require if the office were
> filled); and
>
> (b) a time limit by which the rules require the action to be
> performed has expired
> }
>
> [Makes fast and sudden deputisation a perk rather than a superpower.]
Wait. What?
