On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 15:44, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
>> I submit the following arguments on the CFJs which Murphy's website shows
>> will be assigned the numbers 2203-2205:
>>
>> An excerpt from Rule 2172:
>> {{{
>> The option selected shall be considered to be clearly identified
>> if and only if the truth or falsity of the specified
>> condition(s) can be reasonably determined, without circularity
>> or paradox, from information published within the voting period.
>> }}}
>> The text of the contract that defined the options was not published during
>> the voting period, and rule 2172 does not make an allowance for text
>> published /before/ the voting period.
>
> Counter-evidence:
>
> Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:21:26 -0700 Voting period of Proposal 5707 begins
> Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:13:41 -0600 Vote Market text published
> Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:21:26 -0700 Voting period of Proposal 5707 ends
>
>
So we are saying that SELL votes aren't valid unless the VM is
published during the voting period on which they are cast? That is
somewhat ridiculous, isn't it?
BobTHJ
