On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 18:54 +0100, ais523 wrote: > I submit the following arguments and judgement on CFJs 2086 and 2087: Oh, I just noticed I didn't properly address comex's arguments on 2086b. I'll say only that as they were about semantics, they were unrelated to the other arguments about the case, and I don't interpret ehird's statements the way comex did (and I don't believe most other people do either). -- ais523
