Wooble wrote: > I hereby initiate an equity case regarding the Protection Racket > contract, the parties to which are Wooble, ehird, and BobTHJ. ehird > and BobTHJ are, and have been for quite some time, in material breach > of Section 11 of the contract by remaining Supine and thus ineligible > to judge CFJs. Heh, as a Favourholder I wanted to do that myself, but couldn't due to not being a Don. Maybe we should change the rules so equity cases can be made against arbitrary contracts, or at least arbitrary public contracts? -- ais523
<<winmail.dat>>
