On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Argument: Other amendment processes don't necessarily 'violate' it in > the sense of making it not counting as having agreed to the amendment > either; for instance, without-objection, or without member objection, or > any method that gives people a chance to leave the contract before it's > resolved. I think pretty much all popular contracts at the moment have > such an agreement-safe mechanism.
Well, unanimous consent isn't rules-defined; I'd say without objection + a chance to review an amendment is equivalent to unanimous consent; every party has implicitly consented to the change by not objecting to it (or by leaving the contract).
