On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope, not at all, I'm not sure where you claim to be talking from
> authority about the original intent of this. (iii) was for Mousetraps.
> The original intent of (iv) was to protect against "secret" amendments
> and to ensure that the Proposal System remained the Proposal system,
> when the Rules were intended to be treated as an agreement.
{
None of the rights in R101 were added when this version of R101 was written,
they were just pulled together from different parts of the Rules and
called "rights". iv was a direct result of Mousetrap (biggest scam EVAR!!)
and has come up many times prior to the "rights" form (e.g. CFJs 1289-1290).
}
-you, http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-discussion@agoranomic.org/msg11255.html
