On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > Mine is semantically and logically 100% accurate, in that the CFJ > statement "a Notice of Intent is required to be posted before the time > a matching w/o Objection action is performed" would be judged TRUE based > on R1728. This matches the exact wording of the Holiday Rule "if A is > required before given time B". The fact that the same statement would > also be true for *any* given time B 0-4 days before the action doesn't > alter/reduce its truth or the fact that it matches the holiday rule > precisely.
Don't be so sure... I too thought I had a sure winner when the wording of Rule 2141 (a rule may) matched the MS rule (the Monster may do), but it was judged to not work.
