On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 20:28 -0500, comex wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > comex violated R2158 (power 2) by failing to assign a judgement to CFJ
> > 2316 as soon as possible after e become assigned to it as Judge.
> >
> > comex violated R2158 (power 2) by failing to assign a judgement to CFJ
> > 2317 as soon as possible after e become assigned to it as Judge.
>
> I contest these. The accusations are probably accurate, but four
> rests is an inappropriate penalty for failing to judge CFJs.
>
I'd agree with this; I'd recommend the usual 2-rest punishment for one
of them, but DISCHARGE for the other as multiple failing to judge
(especially on linked CFJs!) is not particularly worse than single
failing to judge.
--
ais523
