On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 08:47 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: > Wooble wrote: > > > I intend, with Support, to publish an NoV accusing H. Rulekeepor comex > > of violating Rule 2215, a Power 1 Rule, by publishing a copy of the > > ruleset which doesn't include the rule created by P6072, in an attempt > > to mislead the other players as to its existence. It's extremely > > detrimental to the game to have a secret rule that gives someone a > > power-3 dictatorship. > > > > I intend, with 2 Support, to publish an NoV accusing H. Rulekeepor > > comex of violating R2161, a Power 1 Rule, by failing to assign an ID > > number to the rule created by P6072 as soon as possible after it was > > enacted. > > I support both of these. I, for one, think that any alleged ambiguity > in the state of the rules should be reported prominently (possibly by > adding a separate include-file directive to the top of the code that > auto-generates the Logical Rulesets).
Technically speaking, that isn't information that improves the readability of the SLR; wouldn't it therefore violate a strong encouragement in rule 1681? -- ais523
