On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > I intend, with Support, to publish an NoV accusing H. Rulekeepor comex > of violating Rule 2215, a Power 1 Rule, by publishing a copy of the > ruleset which doesn't include the rule created by P6072, in an attempt > to mislead the other players as to its existence. It's extremely > detrimental to the game to have a secret rule that gives someone a > power-3 dictatorship.
The judgement that ruled that the rule exists was published two days ago, before which I thought it probably didn't, and we haven't even reached the appeals deadline. I'm kind of conservative with this and I don't believe Zefram ever recorded ambiguity notes due to new rules created by scams, though maybe that's just because there weren't any scams that created new rules (I don't remember) and I can include them if it's beneficial. The rule will be repealed as soon as I get the chance-- I've been busy this week. Do you really have to call criminal cases over ID numbers? Sheesh.
