On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 16:13 -0400, comex wrote: > In my opinion, if it had said "all duties", ais523's argument would be > valid; as it is, I think the best interpretation (considering that 'in > a timely manner' is located at the end and vaguely defined) is that > the contestmaster is merely required to perform some duties related to > the contest-- not necessarily all, but e gets no points if e performed > no duties even if no duties are required of em.
What about the admittedly vacuous duty of publishing a null string every week? -- ais523
