On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: > Since it seems > unreasonable to add an obligation retroactively due to changing > circumstances, it seems equally unreasonable to remove one. > > I judge case 2403 to be TRUE.
I'm not sure about this one at all. For example, let's say I'm required to award a player something that only applies to players, but e deregisters first (before the time limit even). Does that mean I'm still obligated to do so? -G.
