ais523 wrote:

> For an even more stark example of this (which may not be directly
> applicable), consider a power-3 rule saying "Players MAY A. Players MAY
> B.", and a power-1 rule saying "Players MAY NOT B." In this situation, I
> believe that B is illegal (although punishments for it would be for
> breaking a power-1 rule); Bing does not break the power-3 rule, but does
> break the power-1 rule, and the power-3 rule does not make it legal.

Proto-Proposal:  Fix MMI
(AI = 3, please)

Amend Rule 2152 (Mother, May I?) by replacing this text:

      5. MAY: Performing the described action does not violate the
         rule in question.

with this text:

      5. MAY: Performing the described action does not violate the
         rules.

Reply via email to