On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > I retract the previous version of this proposal. > > Proposal: Decriminalize restricted actions > (AI = 3, please) > > Amend Rule 2125 (Regulation Regulations) by replacing this text: > > d) The rules explicitly state that it MAY be performed while > certain conditions are satisfied. Such an action MAY NOT be > performed except as allowed by the rules. > > with this text: > > d) The rules explicitly state that it MAY be performed while > certain conditions are satisfied. Except as allowed by the > rules, performing such an action is the Class-N Crime of > Restricted Behavior, where N is the maximum power of the > rules explicitly allowing it (rounded up as needed to > become a valid Class of Crime). >
.....So if we MAY do it, we may not do it?
