On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > However, since that's defined under "unique" patent titles, there may > be an error in that only the last Maniac should have the title. Unless > Maniac was somehow made non-unique prior to the wins.
Good catch. It was listed as unique right up until it was repealed. I believe this means that only Craig actually holds the title. It's a shame that Peekee didn't get a win for it, as this means there will no longer be any record of em achieving the condition. -root
