On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:47 PM, comex <com...@gmail.com> wrote: > the difference is "accusing that player of violating" versus > "alleging that that player violated". I'm not sure whether the > difference is meaningful.
Why do I have the feeling that if Pavitra had remained inactive, the people who are going to claim that "alleging" doesn't mean "accusing" now would have insisted that they're synonyms, and that it's in the spirit of the rules to allow the wins by solitude?
