comex wrote: > That made me look something up, though-- how exactly does ratification > of the ruleset work again? The Rule Changes involved are generally > not clearly specified, no rule allows Rule 1551 (Ratification) to make > Rule Changes specifically, and Rule 105 (Rule Changes) takes > precedence over it. I seem to remember there was a CFJ about it > though.
Why can't R1551 change the rules? It's an instrument with sufficient power (and if it isn't, the ratifying instrument is).
