On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Geoffrey Spear<geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Sean Hunt<ride...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I disagree. Switching to REASSIGN doesn't deny salary, it just prevents >> excess salary from being earned. The judge still gets salary for >> judgments like "TRUE because pigs were on an airplane" or "FALSE >> because". Heck, you still get salary for "UNDETERMINED because I'm too >> lazy to think about this case". > > The solution is to start assigning IIs > 1 to all CFJs, so bad judges > won't get to judge anything at all. >
I also think IIs are underused. I didn't understand their purpose until reading the ruleset maybe 3 or 4 times.
