On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Paul VanKoughnett<allisp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Proposal: Harder on bad judges (II=1, AI=1.7, please)
> {
>     Amend rule 911 (Appeal Cases) by appending the following paragraph:
>    "If an appeals panel delivers a judgement other than AFFIRM, it CAN destroy
>     any Notes and/or Ribbons the prior judge gained as a result of
> that judgement."
> }

Bug: The appeal judgement could occur before the Note was gained, or
it could have already been spent.

Reply via email to