On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Paul VanKoughnett<allisp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Proposal: Harder on bad judges (II=1, AI=1.7, please) > { > Amend rule 911 (Appeal Cases) by appending the following paragraph: > "If an appeals panel delivers a judgement other than AFFIRM, it CAN destroy > any Notes and/or Ribbons the prior judge gained as a result of > that judgement." > }
Bug: The appeal judgement could occur before the Note was gained, or it could have already been spent.