ais523 wrote: > "Cretans" doesn't hold here, the rule doesn't claim precedence over > itself. (Maybe it should be generalised to all self-contradictions?) The > "current holder" here is interesting; my reading is "holder at the time > of vote collecting". It doesn't seem ridiculously counter-common-sense > to me that a position, rather than a person, could be a vote collector; > but the rules don't seem to back my interpretation up. Unfortunately, > I'm not entirely sure they back up yours either; it's quite a grey area.
I think Zefram once judged that the position of vote collector for proposals was attached to Assessor, so moved with the office; but this may have been superseded by subsequent explicit legislation one way or the other. Someone want to look up details?
